The ed-tech backlash has reached the campaign trail. School leaders should answer it with tool-by-tool judgment about purpose, cost and evidence, not blanket bans or blind defense.
A school AI ban or a return to paper tests can buy time, but neither redesigns the work. Leaders should define the thinking students must do themselves and make it visible.
School AI bans respond to real concerns, but control isn’t leadership. A pause can buy time; only clear purpose, honest conversation and student voice build the judgment schools need.
Giving educators an AI account is not professional learning. It is the beginning of a workplace change. San Francisco Unified has deployed ChatGPT Edu to 12,000 teachers and staff while still developing its districtwide AI policy. Its public guidance says it is not board-approved and may no longer be current; a final policy vote is […]